Anshu Bansal is the founder/CEO of Clouddefense.ai-With CNAPP that ensures both applications and cloud infrastructure.
It is 2025 and the industry has built some of the most advanced clouds that has ever seen-self-esteem, real-time threat detection and infrastructure escalating with just a few lines of code. However, data violations do not slow down – why?
Because a single incorrect configuration – often as simple as an overly permissible IAM role or an exposed storage bin – can destroy everything.
In fact, cloud deformities are often called “technical supervision”. But it is a systematic failure – a gap between the way we build, secure and perceive the cloud risk.
Having spent more than a decade in technology, I have seen organizations throw millions into cutting -edge tools, only to blind from violations caused by arrangements. Misinterpretations remain number one The cause of cloud violations, not because we do not have the technology to correct them, but because we continue to deal with the symptoms, not the main causes.
Here, I will break because the industry continues to stumble on this issue and, most importantly, how we can finally move on.
The hidden complexity behind “simple” misunderstandings
Misconceptions are often rejected as “careless mistakes”. For example, a forgotten storage bin remained open to the public or an IAM role with broader rights than necessary.
Easy corrections, right? Not enough.
In modern surroundings, what looks like just one mistake is usually the by -product of complex, fast work flows. For example, take a developer who rotates a new microservice, working in a CI/CD conductor and developing the infrastructure as a code (IAC). The security team may not even see the new environment until it is alive. If the standard they use includes excessively allowed IAM policies, this incorrect configuration automatically spreads to any future development.
And, here is what most people lose: misunderstandings do not happen individually. They are often connected to blind points context. A storage bin that is open to the public is not always dangerous – unless it contains sensitive production data or exposes internal infrastructure routes. But cloud security tools typically signify everything equally, drowning groups in alerts, while critical issues will be buried.
Basic complexities that often go unnoticed:
• Drift Cloud: Configurations change quickly in environments, creating gaps.
• Blindspots Automation: IAC can automate vulnerabilities if underlying patterns contain misleads.
• Lack of frame: Tools mean issues without understanding their real impact.
The real challenge is not to determine insanity. He understands them in the context. And there is where traditional security approaches are left behind.
Why are cloud misleading
If misinterpretations are the main cause of most violations, why do traditional security solutions not solve the problem? Because they focus on the detection, not on prevention.
For example, let’s consider that a developer rotates a new presence of clouds for a project with a strict deadline and a quick sprint. They use an IAC standard that worked the last time without problems. The project is released live. Weeks later, Security marks an open port exposing API sensitive. Does it sound familiar? If so, this is where the traditional approach is lacking:
Ask most people who will happen to misinterpretation and say “human mistake”. This is only half of the story. The real causes are running deeper – given the way in which modern cloud environments work.
Here’s what really feeds these vulnerabilities:
• Speed against Security: The cloud thrives in flexibility. Developers push the code quickly, often under strict deadlines. Security checks? Are regarded as congestion. When speed wins, security loses.
• Transfer configuration: Even safe developments do not remain so. Someone adjusts a security team to try and forget to restore it. This “Drift” creates gaps that often lose traditional tools.
• Lack of frame: Security tools mean issues but do not prioritize danger. Is it an open port in a dev appearance as critical as one in production? Most tools face both the same, drowning groups in noise.
• Workflows: Developers are developing. Security scans later. Themes have been highlighted after installation, often days or weeks later. Until then, the damage can already be done.
• default configurations: Cloud providers offer fast starting settings, but these defaults prioritize functionality, not security. Unless the teams tighten the settings manually, they are exposed from day one.
Solving the Root problem: How to eliminate cloud misinterpretations
The elimination of cloud paranormes is not just about repairing individual issues. It is about defining the system that allows them to be in the first place. From my experience, the most effective approach involves the shifting left and integrating security at every stage of the Cloud life cycle.
Here’s what works.
• Left shift safely with the developer: The easiest problems to be corrected are those that never reach production. Developers should have tools that mark the dangerous arrangements when drafting code, not after development. If your conductor does not scan IAC standards, you fly blind.
• Imposition of the minimum privilege of default: Excessive rights are a common culprit. Adopt the principle of minimum privilege for IAM roles, service accounts and APIs. Make sure any identity – human or machine – only has the rights that are absolutely needed.
• Apply continuous monitoring of incorrect configuration: The cloud surroundings are constantly changing. A little update can overturn the weeks of careful security work. Continuous surveillance tools help catch these shifts – before turning into real threats.
• Automation of policy imposition: People lose things. Automation usually does not. Use policy boxes as code such as AWS Config, Azure Policy or Open Policy Agent to enforce security standards. If a wrong resource does not meet politics, it should not develop – simple too.
• Using advanced cloud security tools: This is where the management of the cloud security attitude (CSPM) shines, especially in multi -cloud environments. These platforms don’t just say, “Hi, something is not going well!” They prioritize risks, show possible impacts and even guidance recovery.
• Closing the visibility gap: An incorrect bin that hosts non -sensitive logs is not worth the same urgent with the data of the customer it holds. Tools that combine configuration warnings with the risk frame help to prioritize effective corrections.
Final thoughts
After working in this area for years, I can say with confidence that only the tools will not save us. It gets a shift in mindset. When everyone – from the leadership developers – understand the dangers and holds their role, the whole system becomes stronger.
The cloud goes nowhere, nor is it misleading. But if we build smarter habits, use the right tools and stop trusting the defaults, we can keep them from making headlines.
The bottom line? Cloud security is not someone else’s job. It’s everyone.
Forbes Technology Council It is a community only for an invitation for CIOS, CTOS and world -class technology. Do I qualify?
