Westborough, MA – 10 November: David Wang, Amazon Robotic Software Engineer, works in robots … more
Delivery robots that will “overcome” Vans, a $ 10b data center in North Carolina and definitely more in the coming weeks. What you have read is just a sampling of the stories that have found their way to news about Amazon recently. He is trying to discover a business future that will definitely look like nothing like the present.
Everything raises a question: Why Amazon does so much, trying so much, and spends so much? It is already one of the rare nouns, verbs and adjectives of commerce, and according to FTC, it is a “monopoly”. What is the point of spending huge sums in the future, when the future is allegedly safe?
The answer to the questions asked is that Amazon has no choice. While the FTC is limited by the acquaintances and works as if online shopping is the e -commerce borders, Amazon executives recognize that the only way it can remain relative is through the discovery of what would close what makes it look so impregnated in the eyes of a visible FTC described in the present. It’s a frightening idea. For Amazon.
Against all yields, Jeff Bezos discovered a retail trade that was firmly fired from powers-which was retail (including Walmart) in the 1990s. Amazon was an idea of a specialized closure. The normal between us would always prefer to buy books in a store around other people, and while keeping the books naturally. Same with CD and DVD. Hopefully readers will see where this is going.
As we should remember, Amazon’s climb by the bookstore to one of the most important commercial names was ever the epitome of the unlikely. No one believed that Bezos et al had a chance. If you challenge this, check the net value of bezos and Amazon’s maximum purchase ceiling of about $ 2.2 trillion. Purchases are very effective for established businesses to leave $ 2.2 billion Business Concept Pass, let alone one that can be measured in trillions of dollars. What Bezos et al saw, they saw unique.
We hope that it explains the frenzy of experimenting the Amazon in the present. To remain AmazonSeattle giant executives have to somehow discover what will happen. Okay, then, what will happen?
Studying what is front is useful to return to FTC. To say that the Commission is looking back on the offenses. At the same time, he talks about the difference between the regulatory authorities imagining tomorrow will look the same as today and the shareholders for whom the relentless demand is that executives see 5, 10 and 15 years in the commercial future.
In other words, to remain Amazon once again AmazonHe must perform another miracle whose scope counts until his deep transformation of how we shop. Easy; Words will not be lost by answering such a question.
In fact, you don’t have to answer the question. Instead, readers can simply scan the Amazon stories in the news now, and beyond. They do not bind large sums to various projects because they know what they are in front, but because they do not. What pays for all these experiments are the previous successes that FTC focuses on.
In the case of Amazon, he does not have the luxury of looking back. This means that it will bring a missing FTC to its back as it tries at a great cost to see in the future. The irony is that FTC is blind for the concept of such a substantial investment by Amazon, the investment itself that makes it difficult to thoroughly in the case of FTC.
